Cybersecurity Policy Template

Third-Party Risk Assessment Policy

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose and Scope: This policy establishes a framework for identifying, assessing, mitigating, monitoring, and managing risks associated with third-party providers (TPPs) who process or access the organization's information assets. This includes, but is not limited to, suppliers, vendors, contractors, consultants, and business partners. The scope covers all TPPs who handle data classified as confidential, sensitive, or personal, regardless of their location or the nature of their services. This policy applies to all employees, contractors, and other personnel involved in engaging with or managing TPPs.

1.2 Relevance to ISO 27001/2022: This policy directly supports the requirements of ISO 27001:2022, specifically addressing Annex A controls related to supplier relationships, information security risk assessment, and risk treatment. It aligns with the principles of risk management outlined in the standard, ensuring a systematic and documented approach to managing third-party risks.

2. Key Components

The Third-Party Risk Assessment Policy includes the following key components:

  • TPP Identification and Categorization: Identifying all TPPs and classifying them based on their risk level.

  • Risk Assessment Methodology: Defining the process for conducting risk assessments on TPPs.

  • Risk Assessment Criteria: Specifying the criteria used to evaluate the risks posed by TPPs.

  • Risk Mitigation Strategies: Outlining the strategies for mitigating identified risks.

  • Contractual Agreements: Defining the requirements for contractual agreements with TPPs.

  • Monitoring and Review: Establishing the process for monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the risk management program.

  • Incident Response: Defining procedures for handling security incidents involving TPPs.

3. Detailed Content

3.1 TPP Identification and Categorization:

  • In-depth Explanation: This involves creating a comprehensive inventory of all TPPs, including their contact information, services provided, and access to information assets. TPPs should be categorized based on their criticality and the potential impact of a security breach. A simple categorization could be Low, Medium, and High risk. Factors like the sensitivity of the data accessed, the duration of the relationship, and the TPP's security posture will determine the category.

  • Best Practices: Utilize a centralized repository (e.g., a database or spreadsheet) to track TPP information. Regularly review and update the inventory.

  • Example: A company using a cloud storage provider for sensitive customer data would categorize this TPP as High risk due to the sensitivity of the data. A low-risk TPP might be a stationery supplier.

  • Common Pitfalls: Failing to identify all TPPs, inconsistent categorization of TPPs, and lack of regular updates to the TPP inventory.

3.2 Risk Assessment Methodology:

  • In-depth Explanation: This section details the process for conducting risk assessments. It should include a structured approach, such as using a standardized questionnaire, performing on-site audits, or reviewing security certifications.

  • Best Practices: Employ a risk assessment framework, such as NIST Cybersecurity Framework or FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk). Use a consistent methodology across all TPP assessments.

  • Example: A questionnaire could assess the TPP’s security controls, including data encryption, access controls, incident response plans, and security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001). High-risk TPPs may require on-site audits.

  • Common Pitfalls: Using an inconsistent or insufficiently detailed methodology, neglecting to consider all relevant risks (e.g., operational risks, reputational risks), failing to document the assessment process.

3.3 Risk Assessment Criteria:

  • In-depth Explanation: Specifies the criteria used to evaluate risks, such as the likelihood and impact of potential security breaches. This may include factors like the sensitivity of the data processed, the TPP’s security controls, and their geographical location.

  • Best Practices: Use a standardized scoring system to quantify the likelihood and impact of risks. Clearly define the thresholds for each risk level (e.g., Low, Medium, High).

  • Example: Likelihood (Low: 1, Medium: 2, High: 3) and Impact (Low: 1, Medium: 2, High: 3). A TPP with a high likelihood and high impact would be considered High risk (3x3 = 9).

  • Common Pitfalls: Using subjective criteria, neglecting to consider the impact of different types of breaches, using inconsistent scoring systems.

3.4 Risk Mitigation Strategies:

  • In-depth Explanation: This outlines the strategies for mitigating identified risks. These might include contractual requirements, security controls, monitoring activities, and incident response plans.

  • Best Practices: Prioritize risk mitigation strategies based on the risk level. Implement a combination of preventative and detective controls.

  • Example: For a High-risk TPP, mitigation strategies might include requiring specific security certifications (e.g., ISO 27001), regular security audits, data encryption, and robust contractual clauses regarding data protection and incident reporting.

  • Common Pitfalls: Failing to implement effective mitigation strategies, relying solely on contractual agreements without verifying their implementation, not regularly reviewing the effectiveness of mitigation strategies.

3.5 Contractual Agreements:

  • In-depth Explanation: This section defines the requirements for contractual agreements with TPPs. These should include clauses related to data protection, security controls, incident reporting, liability, and termination.

  • Best Practices: Use standardized contract templates that incorporate all necessary security requirements. Engage legal counsel to review and approve contracts.

  • Example: Contracts should clearly specify the TPP’s responsibilities regarding data security, data breach notification, and liability in case of a breach. They should also include clauses regarding data ownership, access control, and data destruction.

  • Common Pitfalls: Lack of clear and concise contractual language, omission of critical security clauses, failing to obtain appropriate legal review.

3.6 Monitoring and Review:

  • In-depth Explanation: This outlines how the effectiveness of the risk management program is monitored and reviewed. This includes tracking key metrics, conducting periodic assessments, and reviewing contractual agreements.

  • Best Practices: Establish key performance indicators (KPIs) to track the effectiveness of the program. Conduct regular reviews (e.g., annually) of the TPP risk assessment process.

  • Example: Track the number of TPPs assessed, the number of identified vulnerabilities, and the time taken to remediate vulnerabilities.

  • Common Pitfalls: Insufficient monitoring, lack of regular reviews, failure to update the program based on the review findings.

3.7 Incident Response:

  • In-depth Explanation: This describes the process for handling security incidents involving TPPs. It should include clear communication protocols, incident reporting procedures, and post-incident review processes.

  • Best Practices: Establish clear roles and responsibilities for incident handling. Develop a detailed incident response plan that includes steps for containment, eradication, recovery, and lessons learned.

  • Example: The plan should specify who should be notified in case of a security incident, how the incident should be investigated, and what actions should be taken to mitigate the impact.

  • Common Pitfalls: Lack of a clear incident response plan, inadequate communication procedures, failure to conduct post-incident reviews.

4. Implementation Guidelines

1. Develop a TPP Inventory: Identify all TPPs and classify them based on their risk level.

2. Develop Risk Assessment Questionnaires: Create standardized questionnaires for each risk category.

3. Conduct Risk Assessments: Assess the risks posed by each TPP using the chosen methodology.

4. Develop Mitigation Plans: Develop and implement risk mitigation strategies.

5. Negotiate Contractual Agreements: Include security clauses in all contracts with TPPs.

6. Establish Monitoring Procedures: Monitor the effectiveness of the risk management program.

7. Conduct Regular Reviews: Review and update the policy and procedures annually or as needed.

Roles and Responsibilities: The Information Security Officer (ISO) is responsible for overseeing the implementation and maintenance of this policy. Departmental managers are responsible for ensuring that their respective teams comply with the policy.

5. Monitoring and Review

The effectiveness of this policy will be monitored through regular reviews (at least annually), analysis of risk assessment results, tracking of security incidents involving TPPs, and audits of the overall third-party risk management program. The review will include an assessment of the effectiveness of implemented controls, the adequacy of the risk assessment methodology, and the accuracy of TPP categorization. The policy will be updated based on the findings of the review.

6. Related Documents

  • Information Security Policy

  • Risk Management Policy

  • Data Protection Policy

  • Incident Response Plan

  • Contract Templates

7. Compliance Considerations

This policy addresses several clauses and controls within ISO 27001:2022, including but not limited to:

  • Clause 6.1.2: Understanding the organization and its context

  • Clause 6.1.3: Determining the scope of the ISMS

  • Clause 8.1: Operational planning and control

  • Clause 8.2.1: Risk treatment

  • Clause 9.1: Performance evaluation

This policy must also consider relevant legal and regulatory requirements, such as GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, etc., depending on the industry and location.

This comprehensive template provides a strong foundation for a robust Third-Party Risk Assessment Policy compliant with ISO 27001:2022. Remember to adapt it to your organization's specific context, industry regulations, and risk appetite. Regular updates and reviews are crucial to maintain its effectiveness.

Back