Cybersecurity Policy Template

Incident Response Policy

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose and Scope: This Incident Response Policy (IRP) defines the procedures for identifying, reporting, analyzing, containing, eradicating, recovering from, and following up on security incidents affecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of [Organization Name]'s information assets. This policy applies to all employees, contractors, and third-party vendors with access to [Organization Name]'s information systems and data.

1.2 Relevance to ISO 27001/2022: This IRP directly supports the requirements of ISO 27001:2022, specifically addressing Annex A controls related to incident management (e.g., 5.1.1, 5.1.2, 5.2.2, 8.1, 8.2). It contributes to the overall Information Security Management System (ISMS) by providing a structured approach to handling security incidents, minimizing their impact, and ensuring business continuity.

2. Key Components

This IRP comprises the following key components:

  • Incident Identification and Reporting: Procedures for recognizing and reporting security incidents.

  • Incident Classification and Prioritization: Categorizing incidents based on severity and impact.

  • Incident Response Team (IRT): Roles, responsibilities, and escalation paths within the IRT.

  • Incident Containment and Eradication: Steps to isolate and eliminate the threat.

  • Recovery and Restoration: Procedures for restoring systems and data to a functional state.

  • Post-Incident Activity: Lessons learned, review, and improvement actions.

  • Communication Plan: Internal and external communication strategies during an incident.

  • Evidence Preservation and Forensics: Procedures for collecting and preserving evidence.

3. Detailed Content

3.1 Incident Identification and Reporting:

  • In-depth explanation: This section outlines how employees should identify potential security incidents (e.g., unauthorized access attempts, malware infections, data breaches, denial-of-service attacks). It details the reporting channels (e.g., email, phone, ticketing system) and the information required in an incident report (e.g., date/time, location, affected systems, potential impact).

  • Best practices: Implement clear and concise incident reporting procedures, provide training to all staff, and utilize automated detection tools.

  • Example: An employee notices unusual activity on their workstation, including slow performance and unfamiliar processes running. They immediately report the incident via the designated security ticketing system, providing details of the observed anomalies and screenshots.

  • Common pitfalls: Insufficient training, unclear reporting procedures, lack of awareness among employees.

3.2 Incident Classification and Prioritization:

  • In-depth explanation: This section defines a system for classifying incidents based on their impact (confidentiality, integrity, availability) and severity (low, medium, high, critical). This classification drives the response priority.

  • Best practices: Utilize a standardized incident classification matrix, consider factors such as data sensitivity, business impact, and legal implications.

  • Example: A low-severity incident might be a password reset request. A high-severity incident could be a ransomware attack encrypting critical data.

  • Common pitfalls: Inconsistent classification, lack of a clear definition of severity levels, delayed prioritization.

3.3 Incident Response Team (IRT):

  • In-depth explanation: This section defines the IRT's composition, roles, responsibilities, and communication protocols. It should include contact information for each member and escalation paths for different incident severity levels.

  • Best practices: Establish clear roles and responsibilities, conduct regular training exercises, maintain an up-to-date contact list.

  • Example: The IRT consists of a Security Manager (Team Leader), System Administrator, Network Engineer, Legal Counsel, and Public Relations Officer.

  • Common pitfalls: Lack of clear roles, inadequate training, insufficient communication.

3.4 Incident Containment and Eradication:

  • In-depth explanation: Procedures for isolating affected systems, preventing further damage, and removing the threat. This may involve disconnecting infected systems from the network, disabling accounts, and implementing security controls.

  • Best practices: Follow established procedures, utilize security tools like firewalls and intrusion detection systems, maintain regular backups.

  • Example: Upon detecting a malware infection, the IRT isolates the affected workstation from the network, performs a full system scan, and removes the malware. Then, they restore the system from a clean backup.

  • Common pitfalls: Delayed containment, ineffective eradication, failure to isolate affected systems.

3.5 Recovery and Restoration:

  • In-depth explanation: Steps for restoring systems and data to a functional state. This may involve restoring from backups, reinstalling software, and reconfiguring systems.

  • Best practices: Regularly test backups, maintain multiple backup copies, implement disaster recovery plans.

  • Example: Following a server failure, the IRT restores the server from a recent backup, verifies data integrity, and performs system checks.

  • Common pitfalls: Unreliable backups, slow restoration processes, inadequate recovery testing.

3.6 Post-Incident Activity:

  • In-depth explanation: Procedures for reviewing the incident, identifying lessons learned, and implementing improvements to prevent future incidents. This includes conducting a root cause analysis and documenting findings.

  • Best practices: Conduct thorough root cause analysis, document findings clearly, update security controls and policies.

  • Example: After a phishing attack, the IRT reviews the incident, identifies weaknesses in employee training, and updates security awareness training materials.

  • Common pitfalls: Insufficient investigation, failure to implement preventative measures, lack of documentation.

3.7 Communication Plan:

  • In-depth explanation: Outlines procedures for communicating with affected parties (employees, customers, regulators) during and after an incident. This includes notification procedures, messaging, and escalation paths.

  • Best practices: Develop pre-written templates for communication, establish clear communication channels, involve legal counsel as needed.

  • Example: A pre-written press release template is ready for use in the event of a data breach.

  • Common pitfalls: Delayed or inadequate communication, inconsistent messaging, failure to notify relevant stakeholders.

3.8 Evidence Preservation and Forensics:

  • In-depth explanation: Procedures for collecting, preserving, and handling evidence related to a security incident. This may involve creating forensic images, securing logs, and following chain-of-custody procedures.

  • Best practices: Engage forensic experts when necessary, follow established evidence handling procedures, ensure data integrity.

  • Example: A forensic image is created of an infected workstation before any attempts at remediation are made.

  • Common pitfalls: Improper evidence handling, loss or destruction of evidence, failure to follow chain-of-custody procedures.

4. Implementation Guidelines

1. Develop detailed procedures: Expand on each component of the IRP with specific, step-by-step instructions.

2. Establish the IRT: Define roles, responsibilities, and communication channels.

3. Conduct training: Provide comprehensive training to all staff on incident identification, reporting, and response procedures.

4. Test the plan: Conduct regular incident response drills and simulations to evaluate effectiveness and identify areas for improvement.

5. Document everything: Maintain a detailed record of all incidents, responses, and lessons learned.

Roles and Responsibilities: [Clearly define roles and responsibilities for each member of the IRT, including contact information].

5. Monitoring and Review

  • Effectiveness Monitoring: Track key metrics such as the number of incidents, mean time to detection (MTTD), mean time to resolution (MTTR), and the effectiveness of implemented preventative measures. Regular reporting to management is crucial.

  • Review and Update Frequency: This IRP will be reviewed and updated at least annually, or more frequently if necessary (e.g., after a significant incident, following a policy or regulatory change, or based on internal audit recommendations).

6. Related Documents

  • Data Classification Policy

  • Acceptable Use Policy

  • Business Continuity Plan

  • Disaster Recovery Plan

  • Security Awareness Training Program

7. Compliance Considerations

This IRP addresses several clauses and controls within ISO 27001:2022, including but not limited to:

  • 5.1.1: Information security policy

  • 5.1.2: Information security roles, responsibilities and authorities

  • 5.2.2: Communication within the organization

  • 8.1: Operational planning and control

  • 8.2: Incident management

Legal and regulatory considerations will vary depending on the organization’s location and industry. Compliance with relevant data protection laws (e.g., GDPR, CCPA) and other industry-specific regulations must be integrated into the IRP. Legal counsel should be consulted to ensure compliance.

This template provides a framework. It needs to be customized to reflect the specific needs and context of [Organization Name]. Regular review and updates are essential to maintain its effectiveness and compliance.

Back