Cybersecurity Policy Template

ICT Change Management Policy (DORA Compliant)

1. Introduction

Purpose and Scope: This policy defines the process for managing all changes to Information and Communications Technology (ICT) systems within [Organization Name]. It aims to ensure that all changes are properly authorized, tested, implemented, and documented, minimizing disruption to services and maintaining the resilience of our ICT infrastructure. This policy applies to all ICT systems, including hardware, software, networks, and applications, regardless of location or ownership.

Relevance to DORA: This policy directly supports the principles of the DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) framework by promoting faster deployments, improved change failure rate, faster mean time to recovery (MTTR), and higher deployment frequency. By implementing robust change management processes, we aim to reduce the risk of incidents and improve the overall stability and performance of our ICT systems, thereby aligning with DORA's four key metrics.

2. Key Components

The following key components form the foundation of this ICT Change Management Policy:

  • Change Request and Approval Process: Defining how changes are requested, evaluated, and approved.

  • Risk Assessment and Mitigation: Identifying and managing potential risks associated with changes.

  • Testing and Validation: Ensuring changes are thoroughly tested before deployment.

  • Implementation and Rollback Plan: Outlining the procedure for implementing changes and reverting them if necessary.

  • Communication and Notification: Keeping stakeholders informed throughout the change process.

  • Documentation and Auditing: Maintaining accurate records of all changes.

  • Emergency Change Process: Handling urgent changes that require immediate action.

3. Detailed Content

3.1 Change Request and Approval Process:

  • In-depth explanation: All changes must be submitted via a standardized change request form. This form details the proposed change, its impact, the required resources, and the proposed implementation timeline. The request is then routed through an approval workflow based on the change's risk level (low, medium, high). Approval authority is clearly defined based on the potential impact and complexity.

  • Best practices: Use a centralized change management system (e.g., ServiceNow, Jira) to track requests, approvals, and status updates. Implement a clear escalation path for unresolved issues.

  • Example: A developer requests a change to update a library in a web application. The request is submitted, including a description of the change, impact assessment (minor performance improvement, no security implications), and a proposed implementation window. The request is approved by the Development Manager and then the IT Operations Manager.

  • Common pitfalls: Insufficient detail in change requests, lack of clear approval authorities, bypassing the formal process.

3.2 Risk Assessment and Mitigation:

  • In-depth explanation: Each change request undergoes a risk assessment to identify potential negative impacts (service disruption, security vulnerabilities, data loss). Mitigation strategies are defined to address identified risks. This involves identifying potential points of failure and outlining recovery procedures.

  • Best practices: Use a standardized risk assessment matrix to categorize risks based on likelihood and impact. Develop mitigation plans for high-risk changes. Involve security and compliance teams in the risk assessment for security-related changes.

  • Example: A change involving updating a core database server is assessed as high risk due to potential downtime. Mitigation involves scheduling the change during off-peak hours, creating a full backup before the update, and having a rollback plan ready.

  • Common pitfalls: Inadequate risk assessment, neglecting mitigation planning, overlooking dependencies.

3.3 Testing and Validation:

  • In-depth explanation: All changes must undergo rigorous testing before deployment to production. This includes unit testing, integration testing, system testing, and user acceptance testing (UAT), depending on the change's complexity. Test cases should be documented and approved.

  • Best practices: Utilize automated testing wherever possible to increase efficiency and reduce errors. Implement a comprehensive test environment that mirrors the production environment.

  • Example: The library update mentioned above undergoes unit tests by the developer, integration tests with other modules, and system tests on a staging server. UAT is conducted by a representative group of end-users before deployment to production.

  • Common pitfalls: Insufficient testing, inadequate test coverage, failure to document test results.

3.4 Implementation and Rollback Plan:

  • In-depth explanation: A detailed implementation plan outlines the steps involved in deploying the change, including timelines, resources, and responsibilities. A rollback plan is also crucial, outlining how to revert the change if necessary.

  • Best practices: Use change control software to manage the implementation process. Conduct post-implementation reviews to identify lessons learned.

  • Example: The database server update implementation plan specifies the exact steps, including database backup, update installation, and verification. The rollback plan details restoring from the backup and notifying affected users.

  • Common pitfalls: Lack of detailed implementation instructions, insufficient rollback planning, inadequate communication during implementation.

3.5 Communication and Notification:

  • In-depth explanation: Stakeholders need to be informed throughout the change process. This involves notifications about planned changes, updates on progress, and communication of any issues.

  • Best practices: Use multiple communication channels (email, SMS, ticketing system) to reach all stakeholders. Define communication protocols for different types of changes and incidents.

  • Example: Users are notified via email about the planned database server maintenance, including the downtime window.

  • Common pitfalls: Poor communication, inadequate notification, lack of transparency.

3.6 Documentation and Auditing:

  • In-depth explanation: All change requests, approvals, risk assessments, test results, implementation plans, and rollback plans are meticulously documented and stored in a central repository. Regular audits ensure compliance with the policy.

  • Best practices: Use a change management system that provides audit trails. Regularly review and update documentation.

  • Example: All change-related documents are stored in a shared network drive and tracked within the change management system.

  • Common pitfalls: Inconsistent documentation, lack of audit trails, inadequate record keeping.

3.7 Emergency Change Process:

  • In-depth explanation: This outlines the process for handling changes that require immediate action due to an urgent operational need or security threat. This process requires expedited approval, reduced testing, and close monitoring.

  • Best practices: Establish clear criteria for identifying emergency changes. Ensure a well-defined escalation path for urgent situations. Document all emergency changes and conduct a post-incident review.

  • Example: A critical security vulnerability requires an immediate patch. The emergency change process is followed, involving expedited approvals and focused testing, minimizing disruption.

  • Common pitfalls: Insufficient review of emergency changes, inadequate documentation, lack of post-incident review.

4. Implementation Guidelines

  • Step-by-step process:

1. Develop and communicate the policy.

2. Select and implement a change management system.

3. Train personnel on the new procedures.

4. Establish clear roles and responsibilities.

5. Pilot the policy on a small-scale project.

6. Monitor and review the policy's effectiveness.

  • Roles and Responsibilities: Define roles such as Change Manager, Approvers (based on impact and authority), Testers, Implementers, and Communicators.

5. Monitoring and Review

  • Monitoring effectiveness: Track key metrics such as the number of change requests, average change lead time, change failure rate, MTTR, and deployment frequency. Regularly analyze these metrics to identify areas for improvement.

  • Frequency and process: The policy should be reviewed and updated at least annually or more frequently as needed, to reflect changes in technology, business needs, and best practices.

6. Related Documents

  • Incident Management Policy

  • Security Policy

  • Disaster Recovery Plan

  • IT Service Level Agreements (SLAs)

7. Compliance Considerations

  • Specific DORA clauses/controls: This policy directly addresses DORA's four key metrics by improving deployment frequency, reducing change failure rate, shortening lead time, and minimizing MTTR.

  • Legal and regulatory requirements: Ensure compliance with relevant industry regulations, such as GDPR (for data protection) and PCI DSS (for payment card data security), which often have stringent requirements for change management. The policy should address data privacy and security aspects within the change request and approval process.

This comprehensive ICT Change Management Policy, when fully implemented and adhered to, will significantly enhance the resilience and stability of your ICT systems, directly supporting your organization's DORA goals and ensuring compliance with relevant legal and regulatory requirements. Remember that continuous improvement is key; regular reviews and adjustments based on experience and performance data will be crucial for maintaining a truly effective change management system.

Back