Cybersecurity Policy Template

Access Control Policy (DORA Compliant)

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose and Scope: This Access Control Policy (ACP) defines the standards, procedures, and responsibilities for managing access to all organizational systems and data, aligning with the principles of the DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) framework. Its purpose is to ensure the security, integrity, and confidentiality of organizational assets while simultaneously enabling efficient and secure collaboration within the DevOps lifecycle. This policy applies to all employees, contractors, and third-party vendors who access organizational systems and data.

1.2 Relevance to DORA: This ACP directly supports DORA's four key metrics (Deployment Frequency, Lead Time for Changes, Change Failure Rate, Time to Restore Service) by:

  • Reducing Change Failure Rate: By implementing robust access controls, unauthorized changes and misconfigurations are minimized, leading to fewer incidents and failures.

  • Improving Time to Restore Service: Clear access control and well-defined escalation paths facilitate faster incident response and resolution.

  • Increasing Deployment Frequency: Streamlined and secure access management enables faster and more frequent deployments with reduced risk.

  • Decreasing Lead Time for Changes: Automated provisioning and access management processes accelerate the deployment pipeline.

2. Key Components

The key components of this ACP include:

  • User Provisioning and Deprovisioning: Managing user accounts throughout their lifecycle.

  • Authentication and Authorization: Verifying user identities and controlling access privileges.

  • Privileged Access Management (PAM): Securely managing access to sensitive systems and data by privileged users.

  • Access Reviews and Audits: Regularly reviewing and auditing access rights to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.

  • Data Classification and Access Control Lists (ACLs): Categorizing data based on sensitivity and defining access permissions accordingly.

  • Incident Response: Procedures for handling security incidents related to unauthorized access.

  • Roles and Responsibilities: Clearly defining roles and associated access rights.

3. Detailed Content

3.1 User Provisioning and Deprovisioning:

  • In-depth explanation: This section outlines the procedures for creating, modifying, and deleting user accounts. It covers processes for onboarding new employees, updating roles and permissions, and removing access upon termination or role change. Automation should be leveraged whenever possible.

  • Best practices: Automate user provisioning through integration with HR systems. Implement a timely and automated deprovisioning process upon termination or role change. Use least privilege principle (grant only necessary access).

  • Example: Upon hiring, HR automatically creates a new user account in the identity management system. The account is assigned to the appropriate role based on the job description. Upon termination, the system automatically disables the account and removes access to all resources after a defined period (e.g., 24 hours).

  • Common pitfalls: Manual processes, delayed deprovisioning, granting excessive permissions.

3.2 Authentication and Authorization:

  • In-depth explanation: This section defines the methods for verifying user identity (authentication) and determining what they are allowed to access (authorization). Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is mandatory.

  • Best practices: Implement strong password policies, enforce MFA for all users, utilize role-based access control (RBAC) and attribute-based access control (ABAC).

  • Example: All users must authenticate using MFA (e.g., password + one-time code from authenticator app). Developers have access to the source code repository, but not to the production database. Access to sensitive data is granted based on the user's role and department.

  • Common pitfalls: Weak passwords, lack of MFA, insufficient authorization controls.

3.3 Privileged Access Management (PAM):

  • In-depth explanation: This section details the procedures for managing access to sensitive systems and data by privileged users (e.g., administrators, database administrators). This often involves specialized tools for password management, session recording, and auditing.

  • Best practices: Use a dedicated PAM solution, enforce least privilege, rotate privileged credentials regularly, implement session recording and auditing.

  • Example: Database administrators use a PAM solution to access the production database. Their access is limited to specific tasks, and all sessions are recorded and audited. Passwords are rotated every 90 days.

  • Common pitfalls: Shared accounts, infrequent password changes, lack of auditing.

3.4 Access Reviews and Audits:

  • In-depth explanation: This section outlines the process for regularly reviewing and auditing user access rights to ensure they are still appropriate and necessary.

  • Best practices: Conduct regular access reviews (e.g., annually or quarterly), automate audit logging, use security information and event management (SIEM) tools.

  • Example: Access reviews are conducted annually. Managers review the access rights of their team members and remove any unnecessary permissions. Audit logs are reviewed regularly to detect suspicious activity.

  • Common pitfalls: Infrequent reviews, incomplete audits, lack of follow-up on identified vulnerabilities.

3.5 Data Classification and Access Control Lists (ACLs):

  • In-depth explanation: This section describes how data is classified based on sensitivity (e.g., confidential, internal, public) and how ACLs are used to control access to that data.

  • Best practices: Implement a formal data classification scheme, use granular ACLs, regularly review data classifications.

  • Example: Customer PII is classified as "confidential" and access is restricted to authorized personnel only. Access is controlled through ACLs on the database and file systems.

  • Common pitfalls: Inconsistent data classification, overly permissive ACLs, lack of data loss prevention (DLP) measures.

3.6 Incident Response:

  • In-depth explanation: This section outlines procedures for handling security incidents related to unauthorized access.

  • Best practices: Establish clear incident response procedures, designate incident response team, ensure proper communication and escalation.

  • Example: If unauthorized access is detected, the incident response team is notified immediately. The incident is investigated, containment measures are implemented, and a root cause analysis is performed.

  • Common pitfalls: Lack of incident response plan, delayed response, inadequate communication.

3.7 Roles and Responsibilities:

  • In-depth explanation: This section defines the roles and responsibilities for managing access control.

  • Best practices: Clearly define roles and responsibilities, provide training on access control procedures.

  • Example: The Security Administrator is responsible for managing user accounts and access rights. Department managers are responsible for reviewing the access rights of their team members.

  • Common pitfalls: Unclear roles and responsibilities, lack of training.

4. Implementation Guidelines

1. Develop a detailed implementation plan: This plan should include timelines, resources, and responsibilities.

2. Choose appropriate access control tools: Select tools that align with the organization's needs and budget (e.g., identity and access management (IAM) system, PAM solution).

3. Implement access control processes: Configure access control mechanisms (e.g., RBAC, MFA).

4. Conduct user training: Train employees on access control procedures and policies.

5. Establish monitoring and review procedures: Set up monitoring and review processes to ensure the effectiveness of the policy.

6. Document all processes and procedures.

Roles and Responsibilities:

  • Security Administrator: Responsible for the overall implementation and management of the ACP.

  • System Administrators: Responsible for implementing and maintaining access controls within their systems.

  • Department Managers: Responsible for reviewing and approving access requests for their team members.

  • Users: Responsible for following the ACP and reporting any security incidents.

5. Monitoring and Review

  • Monitoring: Regularly monitor system logs and audit trails for suspicious activity. Use SIEM tools to detect anomalies and potential security breaches. Track access review completion rates.

  • Review: The ACP should be reviewed and updated at least annually or whenever significant changes occur in the organization's IT infrastructure or security landscape. This review should involve key stakeholders including security, IT operations, and relevant business units.

6. Related Documents

  • Incident Response Plan

  • Data Security Policy

  • Password Policy

  • Acceptable Use Policy

7. Compliance Considerations

This ACP addresses several DORA principles by enhancing security and operational efficiency. Specific compliance considerations will depend on the relevant industry regulations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS). This policy aims to minimize risks associated with unauthorized access, ensuring compliance with these regulations by promoting data integrity and confidentiality and facilitating faster incident resolution. The specific DORA controls addressed include, but are not limited to, those relating to secure configuration management, change management processes, and incident response capabilities. Regular audits and reviews will be conducted to ensure continued compliance.

Back